STATUS
OF MEDICAID EXPANSION
Background
*On
January 14, Arizona Governor Jan Brewer announced a proposal to expand
Arizona’s Medicaid program, typically known as Arizona Health Care Cost
Containment System (AHCCCS). The
Arizona Hemophilia Association strongly supports the Governor’s proposal to
provide health care services to thousands of low-income, uninsured adults
throughout the state. This is particularly important to childless
adults, who are represented by young
adults with bleeding disorders who cannot afford the expensive premiums because
of this high cost of treatment.
*Affordable
Care Act mandated that Medicaid would be expanded to 133% Federal Poverty Level
(FPL) for all citizens. The state would receive:
- 100% federal match for expanding coverage for parents and childless adults from 100% - 133%FPL
- 85% federal match (growing to 90%)
for restoring eligibility for childless adults below
100% FPL
*The
Supreme Court ruled that Medicaid expansion could not be mandated and states
could choose. Governor Brewer and several organizations have endorsed the
Medicaid Expansion, now being called ‘Medicaid Restoration’ because it would
essentially provide coverage to the childless adults that have been frozen out.
*There
are mandated provisions with the Affordable Care Act that must be implemented
whether or not Arizona expands. These include coverage for children and
*In
order for the expansion to move forward, the Arizona Legislature must
approve the Governor’s plan. AHA is part of a coalition to encourage our
legislators to support the expansion. She is proposing:
1. Covering adults up to 133% FPL
- this would only add
57,000 people to the population already covered by
proposition 204.
2. Instituting a Safeguard, called
a circuit breaker, that discontinues the expansion
if the federal match goes below 80%. States are able to opt in and out of the program at any time
3. Provider assessment:
- Allows hospitals to
assess a reimbursable fee upon themselves
– using that revenue to leverage federal assistance.
- Will pay for the
childless adults covered under Prop 204 so
General Funds can be released for other state priorities.
*If
this plan goes through, more than 240,000 Arizonans will be able to obtain
insurance coverage. This will have a dramatic impact on our state’s rate of
uncompensated care and the quality of life for the people of Arizona.
STATUS
We are now past 100 days of the Arizona
legislature being in session. There continues to be dissention in the Arizona
Legislature among the Republican party regarding support for the Medicaid
expansion. The arguments against the expansion seem to be based on ideological
arguments about small government, not contributing to the federal deficit and
being against ‘Obamacare’. The expansion (now called the Restoration because it
essentially restores coverage to childless adults) makes sense from a moral, fiscal and economic standpoint.
The moral argument requires little discussion.
Many of those impacted have chronic care conditions, serious medical conditions
such as cancer, or serious mental illness. Not having coverage for these
childless adults would increase healthcare costs for all taxpayers, cripple our
emergency rooms and cause significant issues to the healthcare system. As you
will see below, fiscally the expansion just makes sense for Arizona. If we do
not expand, we will be either cut existing health coverage or will bear the
cost of coverage to those remaining on AHCCCS costing the State millions. It
will exhaust the rainy day fund that the state has accumulated by cutting
programs the past few years. The economic impact will be profound because if the
state uses its rainy day funds, there will be reduced funds for education,
public safety, etc, that could impact the attractiveness of Arizona for
business growth.
There is a question on whether or not there are
enough votes in favor of the expansion to get it passed on the floor. The
problem is that the President of the Senate (Senator Biggs) and the Speaker of
the House (Rep. Tobin) are both very opposed to the expansion and are
gatekeepers to progress. They are key stakeholders in the process and are not
calling for a vote. There is a question
on whether the expansion decision will be decided during the budget negotiations
(because the State budget relies significantly on what happens with the
expansion), voted on at the legislature,
or delayed until it can be put on the ballot for the general public vote.
The choice that the Legislature makes will
chart the course that will play a large role in dictating the health and
well-being of hundreds of thousands of Arizonans, impact our ability to fund
other critical State services and help determine the future of Arizona’s
economic competitiveness.
On April 25th Governor Brewer sent a letter to
Senator Biggs and Representative Tobin advising that she received notice from
the federal government that if Arizona does not expand, the federal government
will not continue to give federal funding to maintain coverage for childless
adults AHCCCS members. This means that if Arizona does not expand, starting in
January 2014 Arizona will have to fund 100% of the current childless adults
enrolled in AHCCCS or those individuals will all lose coverage. This will cost the state millions of dollars.
From a purely financial argument, not expanding
will cost millions of dollars from the state general fund. Arizona will have to
bear the cost of these childless adults from this fund and will also have to
cover those whose coverage will expand as mandated by the Affordable Care Act
without any federal funding. Many argue the amount, but it could significantly
impact the ‘rainy day fund’ that the state has generated from cuts the past few
years. In turn, this could impact education and other much needed services that
require state funding. It would also have an economic impact
Governor Brewer put forth four options to the
Legislature:
Option 1. Continue
the AHCCCS enrollment freeze and cover remaining childless adults using
State-only funds.
General Fund Cost: $850 million over 3 years
This violates the clear intent of Arizona
voters who, with the passage of Proposition 204 in 2000, expressed their will
to provide AHCCCS coverage to childless aduilts living below the Federal
Poverty Limit (FPL).
Option 2. Restore
AHCCCS coverage for all Childless adults
General Fund Cost: $1.3 billion over 3 years (with 2-1 federal
matching)
This proposal would end the freeze on
enrollment of childless adults, but decline to tap into additional federal
support via the Governor’s plan. As a result, this option would drain Arizona’s
Rainy Day Fund and intensify pressure upon the General Fund as health care
services compete for scarce State dollary with education, public safety and
other core State functions.
Option 3. Terminate
childless adult coverage and drop 63,000 Arizonans from AHCCCS
General Fund Cost: $0
With this option, Arizona on January 1, 2014,
would terminate AHCCCS coverage for an estimated 63,000 Arizonans currently
receiving care, regardless of health condition or manner of ongoing treatment.
This would include cancer patients, our community members with bleeding
disorders and those with serious mental illness. This choice would also
eliminate any chance of AHCCCS coverage for another 240,000 Arizonans that
voters, via passage of Proposition 204, indicated should receive care. The Governor calls this option morally
repugnant and fiscally irresponsible.
Option 4. The
Governor’s Medicaid Restoration Plan
General Fund SAVINGS: $100 million over 3 years
This proposal would restore Prop. 204 coverage
to 240,000 childless adults living below the Federal Poverty Level (FPL) and
expand coverage to 57,000 adults earning up to 133% of FPL. This would allow
Arizona to access a higher federal matching rate in order to help the State
fund Prop. 204 and reduce its pressure upon other State services. Through a
collaborative efforts with the hospital industry, this coverage can be funded through
a provider assessment. There would be no cost to the General Fund, and a
circuit breaker in the plan ensures the State’s participation in the federal
health reform act would automatically cease if the federal government walks
away from its funding promises.
No comments:
Post a Comment